Yesterday Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made the same request of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that was made to Senator Harry Reid BY Mitch McConnell 8 years ago when their parties’ roles were reversed: The request is simply that President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees must meet the same traditional standards that were demanded of President Barack Obama’s nominees eight years ago.
Schumer even went so far as to use a copy of Mitch McConnell’s original document (lest he forget his own words) just marking up/overwriting the necessary areas to reflect the changed circumstances regarding the incoming administration:
Here’s why the request was made :
Republicans, who control the Senate, are starting to hold confirmation hearings but Nominees haven’t completed background checks & ethics clearances that are traditionally required of Cabinet appointees.
These were the first two standards that McConnell demanded of Obama’s Cabinet nominees eight years ago — and that the Obama administration met — when Democrats controlled the Senate.
That’s right, the same person who sent a letter to Senator Harry Reid, then Majority Leader, demanding that the Nominees presented by President Barack Obama first pass the required FBI background check AND the ethics clearance wants to rush through the confirmations for Trump’s nominees without those same checks being completed, even though there are lingering concerns about the Trump administration’s big conflicts of interest around the world. HELLO HYPOCRISY!
Another giant problem looming over the confirmation process?
Per CNBC:Some Trump Cabinet Picks Have Given HUGE Cash Donations to the Senators Voting on Their Confirmations!UM, HELLO??? Anyone Listening?
ForeignPolicy.com shared, “OGE Director Walter Shaub wrote to Schumer and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, (D-Mass.), that he had “great concern” over confirmation hearings being scheduled for several nominees who hadn’t completed the ethics review process.
“I am not aware of any occasion in the four decades since OGE was established when the Senate held a confirmation hearing before the nominee had completed the ethics review process,” Shaub wrote. As long as he remained director, the office “will not succumb to pressure to cut corners and ignore conflicts of interest.”
Because the Republicans now hold a simple majority in the Senate, which is all that is required for the nominees to gain confirmation, it will be a lot easier for Trump’s nominees to slide by without threat of filibuster holding any water.
Before you think all is lost for at least the next 2 years, there is some small, but lingering, hope for those who still believe that some in the senate, no matter what their party, still believe in doing what’s right and not just toeing the party line…
Senator John McCain (R) Arizona – He withdrew his endorsement of Trump over his lewd behavior and disagrees with the President-Elect’s positions on: Foreign Policy, Russian Election Interference, and does not approve of Trump’s nominee of Rex Tillerson (who has close ties to Russia) for Secretary of State;
Senator Rand Paul (R) Kentucky – He is a fringe Republican who doesn’t shy away from publicly disagreeing with his party. He sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee which means he will vote on Tillerson (who he is not supportive of) before he reaches a full Senate vote. He leans Libertarian and is likely to disagree with Trump’s plans for everything from new trade restrictions to immigration and law enforcement.
Senator Lindsey Graham (R) South Carolina – Graham warned that Trump would be unable to handle the challenges facing the next president and destroy the Republican Party in the process. He agrees with McCain that Trump’s foreign policy weaknesses are dangerous.
Senator Ben Nasse (R) Nebraska – Nasse is a harsh critic of Trump. He finds him dishonest and even suggested a third party candidate challenge Trump. He agrees with the weakness in foreign policy and also finds big problems in the nomination of Tillerson for Secretary of State. He is more in line with Rand Paul and will likely challenge any deviation from traditional GOP agenda items.
Senator Marco Rubio (R) Florida – He shares the skepticism over Trumps positions on foreign policy. Rubio also sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee which means he will vote on Tillerson (Rubio distrusts his close Russia ties) before he reaches a full Senate vote.
It will only take 3 Senators crossing party lines on confirmation votes to bring it to Trump’s attention that he can’t run roughshod over Congress. At some point ethics and common sense have to come back into play. Senators are not deaf, dumb and blind. They read the newspapers (or the news online), see Trumps ridiculous behavior via Twitter and those same news sources, and they hear about it in the halls of Capital Hill.
At some point the electorate will come to their own conclusions regarding the occupant of the Oval Office, but for the security of our citizens at home and abroad, the stability and growth of our economy and our standing within the world, those who are elected to do the business of the United States FOR the citizens of the United States better reach their conclusions a hell of a lot faster! HMMM
Do you use Facebook? If you’re interested in the occasional product that intrigues me or something I’ve bought that’s a waste of time or money, things that make me wonder, piss me off, tickle my fancy, scream like a maniac, giggle, or yell in frustration, you can receive an email each time I’ve got something new to ponder or you can join the nearly 2,900 people who find me engaging or amusing at the Facebook page dedicated to this blog: https://www.facebook.com/extremeblondemoments
We’ve all seen political candidates come out to address a crowd with a popular song blaring in the background, but have you ever stopped to think about whether the candidate has the permission of the artist who sang the song, or the publisher who owns the rights to the song? I never have, and apparently neither have many candidates.
Last week Donald Trump pissed off Queen, who have requested he not use their music at his campaign events many times, when he took the stage at the Republican National Convention to their hit song, “We Are the Champions.” Queen guitarist, Brian May, took to Twitter and made it clear that he, and the rest of the surviving members of Queen, do not approve:
Apparently believing that all mentions on Twitter are good mentions, the Trump campaign then used the Beatles classic, “Here comes the Sun” as Ivanka Trump took the stage on Thursday night. While she was the sole ray of sunshine in an otherwise nasty festival of name calling and mudslinging, the campaign again failed to get the proper permissions and the Estate of George Harrison, the song’s writer, was not amused, stating that it was unauthorized, offensive and against their wishes.
The issue isn’t new and one of the song use conflicts goes back to the 1980’s, when Ronald Regan was one of the first to use Bruce Springsteen’s massive hit, “Born in the USA.”
There is a great article, written in November of 2012, by Eddie Deezen for Neatorama.com, in which he describes how many Americans from every walk of life have so badly misunderstood the true meaning of the words of Springsteen’s song, and have turned it into the “ultimate All-American song,” when, in fact, it is an angry song about how horribly the Vietnam Veterans were treated upon their return home from war.
Over the years artists have taken offense to having their songs affiliated with campaigns and candidates haven’t always chosen songs wisely when trying to communicate their messages:
1984 – Ronald Regan (Republican): “Born in the USA” Bruce Springsteen says that his song is, “far from a Rah, Rah America song…that the song has a much darker side” he asked for the Regan campaign to stop using it and they did.
1996 – Bob Dole (Republican): He got shot down twice. First by Isaac Hayes and David Porter who co-wrote “Soul Man,” as performed by Sam Moore, and later the Blues Brothers; then Bruce Springsteen, who again did not want “Born in the USA” used by a politician.
2004 – John Kerry (Democrat): He made a choice that backfired on him when he chose Creedence Clearwater Revival’s, John Fogerty penned, “Fortunate Son,” which he wrote in response to the romance between Eisenhower’s son & Nixon’s daughter, making the dig that neither family would see a son sent to Vietnam. Kerry, a proud Vietnam Veteran, likely chose the song as a dig at the incumbent George W. Bush, who never saw action in Vietnam because of his wealth and family ties that kept him stateside. Kerry lost the election.
2008 – Rudy Guiliani (Republican): “Rudi Can’t Fail” The Clash penned the song as an ode to an irresponsible young man being criticized by his elders. FYI, Rudy Guiliani, while dubbed “America’s Mayor,” citing his grace, strength and stamina in the days, weeks and months following 9/11, did fail. He lost in the primaries and never made it past the nominating process.
2008 – John McCain/Sarah Palin (Republican): First McCain chose ABBA’s “Take a Chance on Me” then he switched the campaign theme song to Heart’s “Barracuda” after adding Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential running mate because it was her nickname in high school. Heart, of course, wanted nothing to do with that dumpster fire of a campaign. It failed.
John Oliver, host of HBO’s Last Week Tonight, highlighted a few of the ironic songs the campaigns have used this campaign cycle with a touch of snark and then got a group of musicians who’ve had their music used without their permission, to collaborate on a very tongue-in-cheek song and video to try and get the message across to politicians in a way they might understand, a video resembling a campaign ad:
Copyright law and publishing rights are on the books for the protection of the artists. It’s time they put some muscle behind their tweets and start making the campaigns, who thumb their noses at them and continue to blatantly use their music, pay for their offenses. Take them to court when a standard cease and desist letter doesn’t get the desired result. Hmmm!
Are you on Facebook? If you are interested in blog follow ups, free or discounted stuff I find, things that make me wonder, scream like a maniac, laugh or yell in frustration, join the more than 2,600 people who find me engaging or amusing at the page dedicated to this blog: https://www.facebook.com/extremeblondemoments